• Careers
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Login
Valenz
  • Solutions
        • Our Platform of Solutions

          A single end-to-end platform of fully integrated health plan solutions that simplifies the complexity of healthcare for employers, payers, providers, and members.
        • Employers

          Health plan and risk affinity solutions including stop loss underwriting and data-driven risk analysis and plan alignment.
        • Members

          Member and clinicial advocacy starts with navigation and manages care across the healthcare journey.
        • Providers

          Credentialing and compliance solutions along with validation, integrity and accuracy of claim submission and reimbursement.
        • Payers

          Maximize health plan savings with payment integrity, network design and market sensitive repricing solutions.
  • Data
    • Decision Enablement
    • Transparency
    • Resources
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Leadership
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Exclusion Monitoring: The Relationship Between the OIG and the System for Awards Management (SAM)

May 17, 2024/in EPStaffCheck, Exclusion Monitoring, OIG Compliance/by tmcadams

When looking into the OIG exclusion monitoring recommendations, you’ve likely noticed that the OIG recommends monitoring sanction and exclusion lists that seem to fall outside of the healthcare field. For example, the System for Awards Management (SAM) program houses sanctions/exclusion lists for many federal agencies from the Department of Justice, the Environmental Protection Agency, and many more. 

Why OIG Recommends Monitoring Non-Healthcare Sanction and Exclusion Lists

At first glance, it may be hard to reconcile why the OIG recommends monitoring SAM when many federal agencies aren’t tied directly to the healthcare field. However, the OIG exclusion monitoring recommendations seek to add protection to everyday citizens on multiple levels, one of those levels being to try and keep known bad actors in other fields and industries away from healthcare.

To examine how the OIG exclusion monitoring recommendations work on a few different levels to protect every day individuals, we can take a look at a couple recent pieces of news from the OIG Enforcement Actions page.

Recent OIG Enforcement Actions

The first enforcement action that we can take a look at is the Department of Defense filed a complaint against six health plans participating in the Uniformed Services Family Health Plan (USFHP) program. The complaint from the DOD alleges that defendants violated the False Claims Act by knowingly retaining erroneously inflated payments for healthcare services the health plans contracted to provide to retired military members and their families. Through the USFHP program, the DOD pays the plans capitated rates to provide healthcare services to their enrollees. According to the complaint from the DOD, in June 2012, the plans learned of calculation errors that had inflated the rates they had been paid in prior years, nevertheless, the plans took steps to conceal the overpayments from the government and continued submitting invoices at the inflated payment rates.

From the way the press release from the Department of Justice reads, the issue here is one of fraud between the aforementioned health plan and the Department of Defense, which might initially obfuscate the main way this lawsuit ultimately helps protect everyday citizens. However, the DOD budget is derived from the taxes of United States citizens. By knowingly defrauding the DOD, USFHP has essentially defrauded the American public by knowingly having some of our tax dollars go towards their false claims. While this may seem pedantic at a certain level, it serves as a good illustration of how the OIG exclusion recommendations seek to protect the public by handing down exclusions to bad actors throughout the field of healthcare, not just doctors and hospitals.

The next enforcement action takes a look at a lawsuit that is completely removed from the healthcare field. This past month a former Navy civilian employee and former executive were indicted in a bribery scheme involving over $100 million in government contracts. The main reason we are mentioning it here is to illustrate that if the OIG exclusion monitoring recommendations only recommended checking the OIG exclusion list each month, bad actors from outside the healthcare industry could have the chance to slip into the industry without many people being the wiser to their history of bribery and fraud. The OIG exclusion monitoring recommendations include searching SAM to ensure these bad actors don’t slip into the healthcare system to prey on everyday citizens and ultimately waste taxpayer dollars on their own designs.

Ensuring Compliance with OIG Exclusion Monitoring

To ensure your program is meeting OIG recommendations, please check out EPStaffCheck.

https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/EPStaffCheck-Blog-photo.png 432 600 tmcadams https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/valenz-logo-1-23-3.png tmcadams2024-05-17 19:43:292024-05-17 19:43:29Exclusion Monitoring: The Relationship Between the OIG and the System for Awards Management (SAM)

Verifying Possible Matches in Your Monthly Compliance Monitoring

March 28, 2024/in EPStaffCheck, Exclusion Monitoring, OIG Compliance/by cschuyler

How should you verify a possible match that comes up during your monthly compliance monitoring? This is a question that we often get phone calls and support tickets about here at Valenz.

First off, a matching, or close matching, name alone is not enough to determine whether the person you are searching for and the possible match that appeared are the same individual. Claiming a searched party is a confirmed match on name alone could expose your organization to FCRA claims and further issues.

Further verification is an important step in the compliance monitoring process as it allows you to be sure of whether a possible match is a full match with verifiable information like date of birth and Social Security Number.

How to Verify a Possible Match

When a possible match does appear during a search, they can sometimes be verified with information that you already have available or can easily retrieve if needed. If you are presented with a possible match during your monthly compliance monitoring, following these steps can ensure that you’re verifying them the correct way:

  • Check for verifiable information in the record details. For example, does the possible result give a DOB for the sanctioned/excluded individual? If not, does it give a middle name? If yes to either of those, and the information does not match that of the searched party, that is a good indication that there is not a positive match.
  • If further information is not given in the record details, find which agency the possible result is coming from. Within EPStaffCheck specifically, this information can be found in column K of the QuickSearchResults.csv file for batch reports, or in the record details section on the very right of the screen for single searches. Once you find the sanctioning/excluding agency, try to locate the possible result within the original source to see if more information is given that could allow you to verify. Original sources for sanction/exclusion lists can be found in the Help section of EPStaffCheck.
  • If no additional information is available after looking up the possible result on the original source, then you will want to determine which method of further verification mentioned below is required for the specific agency the result is coming from.

Verifying a Possible Match with Limited Information

Unfortunately, sometimes there isn’t much information other than a name given for a possible result. When this happens, further verification is required to make a determination. The ways to go about further verifying a possible match often depends on where the sanction/exclusion is coming from, as certain sanction/exclusion agencies have different methods of verification available. The good news is that while there are many different sanction/exclusion agencies, their verification processes usually fall into one of the following categories:

  • Agencies like the OIG, New York OMIG, Texas OIG, Maine HHS, and Louisiana Medicaid have online verification tools you can use to verify a possible match within seconds if you have your searched party’s SSN available.
  • Most agencies will have an email contact and/or a hotline where you can inquire about a possible match that is coming from their sanction/exclusion list. The email contact can usually be found on the same webpage that houses their sanction/exclusion list, though it can sometimes be on the list itself. You can also find contact information for specific agencies in the Help section of EPStaffCheck within the About the Databases folder.

Simplify Your Monthly Compliance Monitoring

If you have additional questions, please check out our other blogs in which we cover topics like What is a Compliance Program? and Why is OIG Compliance Monitoring Required? Additionally, if you would like to explore how Valenz and EPStaffCheck can help your compliance monitoring program visit our website for additional information.

https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/shutterstock_1965187780-Test5.jpg 432 600 cschuyler https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/valenz-logo-1-23-3.png cschuyler2024-03-28 15:33:232024-05-16 16:53:18Verifying Possible Matches in Your Monthly Compliance Monitoring

Why Choose Vālenz® Health as Your Exclusion Screening Partner?

January 24, 2024/in EPStaffCheck, Exclusion Monitoring, OIG Compliance/by cschuyler

We have covered the importance of OIG compliance monitoring in our previous blog post, but we have yet to really get into the “how” when it comes to checking the OIG Exclusion list, State Exclusion lists, SAM (System for Awards Management) EPLS, and the myriad other sanction/exclusion lists you may be inclined to check for compliance. The “how” is where Vālenz® Health’s EPStaffCheck solution comes into play.

Your exclusion screening could just involve going to the OIG website and checking the individuals on your roster against the OIG list of Excluded Individuals, one by one, then repeating the process for state exclusion lists, then again for SAM EPLS, and so on and so forth each month. This consumes employee time that could be spent providing value elsewhere.

Exclusion Screening with EPStaffCheck

EPStaffCheck will let you upload your rosters and will check them against all those sanction/exclusion lists at the same time, and produce a detailed report for you in minutes. EPStaffCheck will immediately let you know which individuals are good to go, and which have possible results that warrant further investigation to ensure your organization isn’t in danger of being hit with a CMP from the OIG or another agency.

EPStaffCheck is also built to tailor directly to your needs as an organization. If you organization is small enough to where checking individuals one by one is your method of choice, you can still save time by checking individuals against multiple sanction/exclusion databases in one place. Need the ability to check batches of individuals and vendors all at one time? Then our Professional tier offers everything you need to ensure your compliance monitoring is top notch. For larger organizations, our Enterprise tier offers expedited support and an admin portal to manage users and set permissions. Beyond that, our Enhanced tier handles the bulk of your compliance monitoring for you, giving your organization one less thing to worry about each month.

On top of saving you time and helping you avoid costly mistakes on the exclusion side of compliance, EPStaffCheck also offers the ability to check licenses to ensure they are valid and up to date.

EPStaffCheck follows Office of Inspector General (OIG) best practices to ensure your organization is audit ready when the time comes with documentation trails to meet all JCAHO requirements.

Improve Your Compliance Monitoring Today

If you are interested in taking steps towards a rock solid compliance monitoring program, explore the tiers of EPStaffCheck or begin your free trial today.

https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/EPStaff-Check-Blog-2.png 432 600 cschuyler https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/valenz-logo-1-23-3.png cschuyler2024-01-24 23:15:042024-05-06 18:50:38Why Choose Vālenz® Health as Your Exclusion Screening Partner?

OIG Compliance Program Guidance

December 29, 2023/in EPStaffCheck, Exclusion Monitoring, OIG Compliance/by cschuyler

Last month, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published its General Compliance Program Guidance (GCPG). The General Compliance Program Guidance (GCPG) is a comprehensive resource guide aimed at consolidating and streamlining current OIG compliance requirements, tips, and guidance into a single location.

The GCPG offers compliance program guidance for providers: The federal laws that make compliance programs necessary (Anti-Kickback Statute, Physician Self-Referral Law, etc.), a comprehensive guide on compliance program infrastructure, ways to tailor the guidance offered for both large and small entities, and other compliance considerations to consider for your program. The General Compliance Program Guidance (GCPC) in its entirety can be accessed here.

This article focuses on important information about GCPG exclusion monitoring. Within the GCPG, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) specifically points out its legal authority to exclude individuals and entities from participation in all Federal healthcare programs, which is likely something anyone working in compliance already knows. However, the GCPG also illustrates that the OIG handles both mandatory and permissive exclusions, and while both kinds of exclusions mean the same thing, they are handed out for different reasons.

Mandatory Exclusions

For Mandatory Exclusions: The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is required by law to manually exclude individuals and entities convicted of certain types of criminal offenses:

  • Offenses related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a State healthcare program
  • Patient abuse or neglect
  • Felony convictions for other health care-related fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct
  • Felony convictions relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance

Permissive Exclusions

For Permissive Exclusions: The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has the discretion to exclude individuals and entities on a number of grounds, including (but not limited to):

  • Misdemeanor convictions related to healthcare fraud not involving Medicare or a State health program
  • Fraud in a program (other than a healthcare program) funded by any Federal, State, or local government agency
  • Misdemeanor convictions relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of controlled substances
  • Suspension, revocation, or surrender of a license to provide healthcare for reasons bearing on professional competence, professional performance, or financial integrity
  • Provision of unnecessary or substandard services
  • Submission of false or fraudulent claims to a Federal healthcare program
  • Engaging in arrangements that violate the Federal anti-kickback statute
  • Defaulting on health education loan or scholarship obligations
  • Controlling a sanctioned entity as an owner, officer, or managing employee

Why is the distinction between Mandatory and Permissive exclusions important if they both ultimately mean the same thing? Just because an individual or an entity has not been part of anything that would require the OIG to hand out a mandatory exclusion does not mean that they haven’t been given a permissive exclusion for something else entirely. The importance lies in the need to regularly monitor the OIG Exclusions List to ensure that the individuals and entities your organization employs and interacts with are not going to bring a Civil Monetary Penalty from the OIG to your doorstep, which is something we discussed in a previous blog post on OIG compliance monitoring.

More Information on OIG Compliance

During the OIG compliance monitoring process, if you do discover that your organization has employed an individual or has contracted with an entity on the OIG Exclusions list, it is best to speak to your legal counsel and explore the OIG’s self-disclosure process. More information on the OIG’s self-disclosure process can be found at Self Disclosure Protocol 2021 (hhs.gov).

https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/shutterstock_2220785815.png 432 600 cschuyler https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/valenz-logo-1-23-3.png cschuyler2023-12-29 12:25:352024-05-06 18:52:18OIG Compliance Program Guidance

Why is OIG Compliance Monitoring Required?

November 14, 2023/in EPStaffCheck, Exclusion Monitoring, OIG Compliance/by ajtemplin

Why is compliance monitoring required? This is a question that has likely crossed the mind of anyone working in compliance, but it’s also one that’s likely not pondered in much detail. Afterall, the “why?” is pretty easy to figure out, because the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) gives healthcare organizations guidelines for compliance monitoring. So rather than looking at the “why?” for compliance monitoring, let us instead look at “what if?”. What happens if compliance monitoring runs behind and someone slips through the cracks and your organization ends up hiring someone that is on the OIG Exclusion list?

So far in 2023, 17 different healthcare organizations have agreed to pay a total of $2.3 million dollars in settlements to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for employing individuals that have been excluded from participating in any Federal health care programs. Out of those 17 healthcare organizations, 8 were hit with settlements above $100,000 by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) just for employing excluded individuals, and in January 2023, Dignity Health Medical Group settled with the OIG for $338,000, all for employing excluded individuals. In addition to those numbers, the settlements paid to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) do not take into account whether those individuals were excluded by other federal or state agencies, which can often be the case and would carry their own separate penalties as well.

OIG Compliance Monitoring with Vālenz® Health

At Vālenz® Health, we’re committed to a strong, vigorous, and healthy vision of healthcare, and OIG compliance monitoring is an important part of that vision. Our product, EPStaffCheck, can help ensure your compliance monitoring program remains top notch by allowing you to monitor sanction and exclusion lists like the OIG Exclusion List, SAM, and all of the available state Medicaid databases all at once. EPStaffCheck will allow you to monitor your providers, staff, and vendors against sanction and exclusion lists to catch any possible compliance issues to ensure your organization does not end up on the wrong side of a settlement with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG).

https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/1.png 432 600 ajtemplin https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/valenz-logo-1-23-3.png ajtemplin2023-11-14 21:01:132024-05-06 18:53:36Why is OIG Compliance Monitoring Required?

Evaluating Possible OIG and SAM Exclusion Matches with Limited Information

September 19, 2023/in EPStaffCheck, Exclusion Monitoring, OIG Compliance/by ajtemplin

You are responsible for exclusion monitoring, so what should you do when there is sparse information in the federal or state database for you to evaluate potential exclusion matches?

This most commonly occurs with the System for Award Management (SAM EPLS) database’s exclusion entries, because SAM often only provides first and last name along with location. The Office of Inspector General Exclusion List (OIG) contains many more data points to help verify any potential sanctioned providers and entities.

SAM consolidates all of the separate government agency’s sanctions, such as the EPA, DOJ, OPM, etc. These agencies generally have the date of birth or partial SSN on file, however, SAM does not include this information within their sanction data, so the actual sanctioning agency must be contacted via phone or email to verify that confirming information against your search data.

Exclusion Matches with EPStaffCheck

TIP: If you are an Enhanced Service subscriber, your Vālenz® Health Representative will complete these second tier verifications for you. If you are a Standard subscriber, you will need to contact these agencies directly to gather the requisite information. The agency contact information can be found under the Help section within EPStaffCheck.

It is also important to collect date of birth from all of your providers with practicing, ordering or referring privileges. To adequately credential and comply with screening requirements, you need to thoroughly know your providers and staff!

https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/2.png 432 600 ajtemplin https://www.valenzhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/valenz-logo-1-23-3.png ajtemplin2023-09-19 20:46:122024-05-06 18:55:15Evaluating Possible OIG and SAM Exclusion Matches with Limited Information

Categories

  • Announcements (112)
  • EPStaffCheck (9)
  • Events (19)
  • Exclusion Monitoring (6)
  • Featured (129)
  • Integrations (8)
  • Misc. (6)
  • OIG Compliance (9)
  • Press (75)
  • Valenz Access (4)
  • Valenz Assurance (4)
  • Valenz Care (9)
  • Valenz Claim (4)

Archive

  • June 2025 (1)
  • April 2025 (2)
  • February 2025 (1)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (4)
  • July 2024 (2)
  • June 2024 (2)
  • May 2024 (5)
  • April 2024 (2)
  • March 2024 (2)
  • February 2024 (5)
  • January 2024 (2)
  • December 2023 (2)
  • November 2023 (3)
  • October 2023 (4)
  • September 2023 (7)
  • August 2023 (2)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • June 2023 (3)
  • May 2023 (1)
  • April 2023 (3)
  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (1)
  • September 2022 (2)
  • August 2022 (3)
  • July 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (2)
  • May 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (3)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (4)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (3)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (3)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (4)
  • December 2019 (2)
  • November 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)

Five Radnor Corporate Center
100 Matsonford Road, #5-444
Wayne, PA 19087
United States of America

Mailing Address
22601 N. 19th Avenue, STE 131
Phoenix, AZ 85027 Box #15
United States of America

Toll-Free: (866) 762-4455
Main Fax: (888) 452-6512

Solutions

Our Platform
Employers
Members
Providers
Payers

Data

Decision Enablement
Transparency
Resources

Company

About Us
Careers
Leadership

Updates

Secure Login
Help Center

Support

OIG Compliance
Exclusion Monitoring

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Policy

Social Media Policy

© Vālenz® Health

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top